Please login first
Felix Roth  - - - 
Top co-authors See all
Wolfgang H. Arnold

63 shared publications

Department of Biological and Material Sciences in Dentistry; School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University; Witten Germany

Ella A. Naumova

10 shared publications

Department of Biological and Material Sciences in Dentistry, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred Herrhausenstrasse 44, 58455 Witten, Germany

Andree Piwowarczyk

8 shared publications

Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Technology, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred Herrhausenstrasse 44, 58455 Witten, Germany

Christine Baulig

7 shared publications

Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Strasse 50, 58455 Witten, Germany;(B.G.);(C.B.)

Berit Geis

1 shared publications

Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Strasse 50, 58455 Witten, Germany;(B.G.);(C.B.)

1
Publication
0
Reads
0
Downloads
0
Citations
Publication Record
Distribution of Articles published per year 
(2018)
Total number of journals
published in
 
1
 
Publications
Article 2 Reads 0 Citations Influence of Luting Materials on the Retention of Cemented Implant-Supported Crowns: An In Vitro Study Ella A. Naumova, Felix Roth, Berit Geis, Christine Baulig, W... Published: 28 September 2018
Materials, doi: 10.3390/ma11101853
DOI See at publisher website PubMed View at PubMed ABS Show/hide abstract
The retention force of cemented crowns on implant abutments with various luting materials was evaluated. Cobalt–chromium crowns were cemented onto tapered titanium abutments (Camlog) with eugenol-free temporary cement (RelyX TempBond NE), composite-based temporary cement (Bifix Temp), zinc phosphate cement (Harvard Cement), glass-ionomer cements (Meron, Fuji I), and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (Fuji II, Fuji Plus, Ketac Cem Plus). Specimen aging via hydrostress was performed in artificial saliva at 37 °C for 14 days (S1), followed by hydrothermal stress with thermocycling (S2). The crowns were removed, and the force was recorded (T1). Subsequently, the crowns were recemented, aged, and removed, and the force was recorded (T2, T3). The retention forces differences were statistically significant according to the storage conditions at T1 (p = 0.002) and T3 (p = 0.0002). After aging (S1), Ketac Cem Plus had the highest retention force median value difference (T3 versus T1) (−773 N), whereas RelyX TempBond NE had the lowest (−146 N). After aging (S2), Meron had the highest retention force median value difference (−783 N), whereas RelyX TempBond NE had the lowest (−168 N). Recementation decreased the retention force of the implant-supported cobalt–chromium crowns cemented and recemented with the same luting materials. Luting materials (at T1) and aging conditions significantly impacted the retention force.
Top